Episode 110 Notes

{cue synth intro}

{cue ‘mortal – stay tuned… EFX}

{cue Evan – time to roll}

{cue intro}

 

Banter:

 

Welcome to the static-charged, sanforized, neutrino-free, hermetically-sealed DADDYCAST!  Its been a busy week.  I’m still fighting this cold – story of my life.  Takes me three weeks to get over a cold.  When I went to the doctor, he basically said, “well, I can tell you to keep doing the NyQuil thing and you’ll be better in 14 days, or I can give you some antibiotics and you’ll be better in two weeks”. {cue rimshot}  I’ll explain the whole static-charged and sanforized thing a bit later on.

 

In the world of parenting, my son had some memorable milestones this week.  He had his first ride on the school bus, and he had his first field trip, and his first hay ride…all in one day.  He’s never actually taken the bus to school…we live too far away, so mommy (and sometimes daddy) take care of the transportation duties.  He visited a pumpkin patch, and picked out a fine specimen.  Mommy is an excellent pumpkin-carver, and uses some of the most wicked carving knives (I think she had these left-over from some biology class, and I’m sure animal disembowelment was their original purpose)

 

I had an encounter with “big brother Bill” today…y’know, Microsoft.  My server PC, where I save all my music and sound EFX for the show needed an “automatic update”.  I let it install, then my network card was dead, and Windows wanted to “register” saying that “your hardware has changed significantly since you registered your windows product” or some such nonsense.  I had to call them THREE times to get through, and had to reboot a bunch of times, only to find out that the so-called UPDATE turned OFF my network, and broke my Firefox web browser.  Now I don’t know if the browser breaking was intentional, but something smells.  I don’t like Microsoft telling me that a product I’ve had for 4 years is suddenly being switched OFF…especially when my hardware has NOT significantly changed…I’m switching to LINUX!  Here I come, penguin-heads!

 

Headlines: “Weighing in” on childhood obesity – it’s the parent’s fault, Kids WiFi at Mickey-D’s, Noisy Toys will be big this holiday season, Building Baby’s Brain with Music, Some food mythology and lots more, after this..

 

{cue drop ELEMENT_2}

{cue Laylah Hathway PSA}

{cue newstheme – the new one with loop added}

 

In The News….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Building Baby's Brain: The Role of Music – STORY #1

By Diane Bales, Ph.D.

 

"Researchers believe that musical training

actually creates new pathways in the brain."

 

Music has a powerful effect on our emotions. Parents know that a quiet, gentle lullaby can soothe a fussy baby. And a majestic chorus can make us swell with excitement. But music also can affect the way we think.

 

In recent years, we’ve learned a lot about how the brain develops. Babies are born with billions of brain cells. During the first years of life, those brain cells form connections with other brain cells. Over time, the connections we use regularly become stronger. Children who grow up listening to music develop strong music-related connections.

 

Some of these music pathways actually affect the way we think. Listening to classical music can improve our spatial reasoning, at least for a short time. And learning to play an instrument may have an even longer effect on certain thinking skills.

 

Does Music Make Us Smarter?

Not exactly. Music seems to prime our brains for certain kinds of thinking. After listening to classical music, adults can do certain spatial tasks more quickly, such as putting together a jigsaw puzzle.

 

Why does this happen? The classical music pathways in our brain are similar to the pathways we use for spatial reasoning. When we listen to classical music, the spatial pathways are “turned on” and ready to be used.

 

This priming makes it easier to work a puzzle quickly. But the effect lasts only a short time. Our improved spatial skills fade about an hour after we stop listening to the music.

 

Learning to play an instrument can have longer-lasting effects on spatial reasoning, however. In several studies, children who took piano lessons for six months improved their ability to work puzzles and solve other spatial tasks by as much as 30 percent.

 

Why does playing an instrument make such a difference? Researchers believe that musical training creates new pathways in the brain.

 

Why Classical Music?

The music most people call “classical”--works by composers such as Bach, Beethoven, or Mozart--is different from music such as rock and country. Classical music has a more complex musical structure. Babies as young as 3 months can pick out that structure and even recognize classical music selections they have heard before.

 

Researchers think the complexity of classical music is what primes the brain to solve spatial problems more quickly. So listening to classical music may have different effects on the brain than listening to other types of music.

 

This doesn’t mean that other types of music aren’t good. Listening to any kind of music helps build music-related pathways in the brain. And music can have positive effects on our moods that may make learning easier.

 

 

 

…I make it a point to NEVER discourage my son when he wants to make music, no matter how horrible it sounds.  In my honest opinion, the fastest way to squelch creativity is to say “that’s awful” to your kid.  You’re the authority, so your kid will believe you if you tell ‘em they suck – so DON’T.  Even if they do!  And never use the word never….oops….


How Does Increased Television Watching "Weigh Into" Childhood Obesity? – STORY #2

 

Newswise - Obesity is one of the major health concerns among both children and adults in the United States today. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) suggests that children should not watch more than two hours of television a day. However, the average child in the U.S. regularly watches between 2-3 hours of television a day, and many children have a television set in their bedroom. Not only are children inactive while they are watching television, they often snack on unhealthy food choices. Establishing unhealthy habits as a child can continue into adulthood. Two articles in the October issue of The Journal of Pediatrics describe the relationship between television watching and childhood obesity.

 

Drs. R.M. Viner and T.J. Cole from the University College London evaluated the effects of early childhood television watching on adult obesity by assessing data from 8,158 participants of the 1970 Birth Cohort. Height, weight, and frequency of television watching were assessed at ages 5, 10, and 30 years. At age 5, approximately 40% of the participants exceeded the AAP's guidelines, although the average number of hours watched was 1 1â„2 hours. The researchers

found that each additional hour of weekend TV watching by five-year-old children over the AAP's suggested two hours may increase the risk of obesity in 30 year olds by 7%.

 

Drs. Kirsten Davison, Lori Francis, and Leann Birch from the State University of New York evaluated the television viewing behaviors of 173 girls and their parents. At both 9 and 11 years old, the girls watched an average of 1.9 hours of television a day, although approximately 39% of girls and 30% of parents exceeded the AAP's guidelines. Parents who relied heavily on television viewing as a recreational activity reported higher levels of television watching with their daughters. Girls who were exposed to two or more parenting risk factors for increased television viewing, such as the lack of parental limitations on their television watching and their parents' own television viewing habits, were five to ten times more likely to exceed the AAP's guidelines at both 9 and 11 years old. Girls who watched more than the recommended two hours per day were 2.6 times more likely to be overweight than girls who watched less than two hours.

 

Limiting the amount of time a child spends in front of the television (for example, removing televisions from children's bedrooms) may be a good way for parents to reduce the risk of obesity in children. Because parents' television viewing habits directly influences their children's, parents must serve as role models. Parents should limit the frequency of television viewing by encouraging alternate forms of recreation and selective program choices for themselves and their children. The TV Turnoff Network (www.tvturnoff.org) offers additional guidance for parents and children who want to spend more time away from the television. Although the increase in childhood obesity is not caused solely by television watching, Dr. Reginald Washington points out in the editorial that accompanies the articles, "Society, as a whole, must realize that to effectively control and prevent this obesity epidemic, all risk factors must simultaneously be reduced."

 

Wanna spend more time away from the TV?  Leave!!  This sounds real convincing coming from a guy who just dropped major bank on a new PLASMA TV – but hey, get up off the couch and go DO something!  Use the TiVo to catch the shows you really wanna watch.  You do that with podcasts, why not TV?

 

My ToonTest segment was created to “test” you all on how much you know about what your kids are watching on TV.  Trust me, if you watch what your kids watch, you will WANT TO LEAVE after awhile!

 


 

 Food Mythology – STORY #3

 

Little Science Behind Baby Feeding 'Wisdom'

 

Sunday, October 09, 2005

 

Ditch the rice cereal and mashed peas, and make way for enchiladas, curry and even — gasp! — hot peppers.

 

It's time to discard everything you think you know about feeding babies. It turns out most advice parents get about weaning infants (search) onto solid foods — even from pediatricians — is more myth than science.

 

That's right, rice cereal may not be the best first food. Peanut butter doesn't have to wait until after the first birthday. Offering fruits before vegetables won't breed a sweet tooth. And strong spices? Bring 'em on.

 

"There's a bunch of mythology out there about this," says Dr. David Bergman (search), a Stanford University pediatrics professor. "There's not much evidence to support any particular way of doing things."

 

Word of that has been slow to reach parents and the stacks of baby books they rely on to navigate this often intimidating period of their children's lives. But that may be changing.

 

As research increasingly suggests a child's first experiences with food shape later eating habits, doctors say battling obesity and improving the American diet may mean debunking the myths and broadening babies' palates.

 

It's easier — and harder — than it sounds. Easier because experts say 6-month-olds can eat many of the same things their parents do. Harder because it's tough to find detailed guidance for nervous parents.

 

"Parents have lost touch with the notion that these charts are guides, not rules," says Rachel Brandeis, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association (search). "Babies start with a very clean palate and it's your job to mold it."

 

It's easy to mistake that for a regimented process. Most parents are told to start rice cereal at 6 months, then slowly progress to simple vegetables, mild fruits and finally pasta and meat.

 

Ethnic foods and spices are mostly ignored by the guidelines — cinnamon and avocados are about as exotic as it gets — and parents are warned off potential allergens such as nuts and seafood for at least a year.

 

Yet experts say children over 6 months can handle most anything, with a few caveats: Be cautious if you have a family history of allergies; introduce one food at a time and watch for any problems; and make sure the food isn't a choking hazard.

 

Parents elsewhere in the world certainly take a more freewheeling approach, often starting babies on heartier, more flavorful fare — from meats in African countries to fish and radishes in Japan and artichokes and tomatoes in France.

 

The difference is cultural, not scientific, says Dr. Jatinder Bhatia, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' nutrition committee who says the American approach suffers from a Western bias that fails to reflect the nation's ethnic diversity.

 

How to introduce healthy children to solid food has rarely been studied. Even the federal government has given it little attention; dietary guidelines apply only to children 2 and older.

 

In a review of the research, Nancy Butte, a pediatrics professor at Baylor College of Medicine, found that many strongly held assumptions — such as the need to offer foods in a particular order or to delay allergenic foods — have little scientific basis.

 

Take rice cereal, for example. Under conventional American wisdom, it's the best first food. But Butte says iron-rich meat — often one of the last foods American parents introduce — would be a better choice.

 

Dr. David Ludwig of Children's Hospital Boston, a specialist in pediatric nutrition, says some studies suggest rice and other highly processed grain cereals actually could be among the worst foods for infants.

 

"These foods are in a certain sense no different from adding sugar to formula. They digest very rapidly in the body into sugar, raising blood sugar and insulin levels" and could contribute to later health problems, including obesity, he says.

 

The lack of variety in the American approach also could be a problem. Exposing infants to more foods may help them adapt to different foods later, which Ludwig says may be key to getting older children to eat healthier.

 

Food allergy fears get some of the blame for the bland approach. For decades doctors have said the best way to prevent allergies is to limit infants to bland foods, avoiding seasonings, citrus, nuts and certain seafood.

 

But Butte's review found no evidence that children without family histories of food allergies benefit from this. Others suspect avoiding certain foods or eating bland diets actually could make allergies more likely. Some exposure might be a good thing.

 

 

…My son LOVES spicy food…Salsa!  Bring it ON!  But WE didn’t discover that!  Our neighbors are from Mexico, and they watch my son every now and then, and THEY found out he liked salsa…funny, the little boy who lives there hates Mexican food!  Pity, Amalia makes the best salsa!

 

Point is, experiment with your kids.  We took my son to a buffet and he ASKED for broccoli…!   Let your friends and extended family try new things on your kids.  Be open-minded, and just because you don’t like something, don’t teach your kids that they don’t like it, cuz theat’s what they’ll learn!  Variety IS, the spice of life….

 

 

In another food related story….
Family Meals = proud kids – STORY #4

 

Study: Family meals nurture resilience in children

 

ATLANTA, Ga. Oct 13 -- Families who regularly share meals together have children who know more about their family history and have higher self-esteem, interact better with peers, and show higher resilience in the face of adversity, according to Emory University psychology professors. These findings are the result of a three-year study called the "Family Narratives Project." Researchers believe that family meals provide a context in which children and parents develop a sense of family history and a family place. They note it's not only what families say, but how they talk about events together that's important. Children benefit when parents listen to them and validate what they say and how they feel, according to researchers, who express concerns that many families have abandoned the family meal and may be losing the benefits that help nurture resilient children.

 

 

…This can be tough when schedules are so fouled up…Shift work, overtime…this can all make family meals tough.  So pencil in a family meal each week, at least.  We reserve SUNDAY as our family meal day…I usually cook or BBQ, and we have music and candles and set the table nice, which means moving piles of papers, homework, bills, laptops, the cat…

 

 


 

Noisy Toys to be Holiday Best Sellers – STORY #5

 

Noisy Toys Set to Be Holiday Best Sellers

By JENN WIANT

Associated Press Writer

 

Parents beware! It's going to be a noisy Christmas.

 

From a voice-modifying Darth Vader mask to stuffed animals that sing mobile phone ringtones, toys unveiled on Wednesday at a London exhibition for the 2005 British holiday season will test the decibel tolerance of most grown-ups.

 

The event has also been a good indicator of what will be hot for the U.S. market for the holidays.

 

The must-have toy of the season this year promises to be Roboraptor, a two-foot long electronic dinosaur with personality. Roboraptor, made by toy company Character Options, is the follow up to last year's British best seller Robosapien.

 

Roboraptor moves on its own, reacting to visual sensors according to one of five modes: hunting, docile, angry, cautious and playful.

 

Put a finger in its mouth while it's in angry mode and Roboraptor will chew on it. Stroke its face while in docile mode and it nuzzles up to you.

 

At 90 pounds ($159), Roboraptor is the most expensive item in the top 12 toys on sale.

 

The cheapest toy in the top 12 is the Crazy Frog Ringtone Plush Character at 12 pounds ($21). The character on display at the Dream Toys 2005 exhibition was a frog labeled 'The singing annoying thing,' which did exactly what it said: It sang a loud, repetitive song that sounded like a cell phone ringing.

 

One popular toy was the Tyco Cyber Shocker by Mattel. The bio-mechanical beast transforms from a tame-looking ball into an all-terrain vehicle with spinning wings that propel it around the floor.

 

Another favorite -  iZ from Vivid Imaginations, a United Kingdom distributor for Bannockburn, Ill.-based toy maker Zizzle Inc. a predicted top toy in the Big Kidz category. The pliable, big-eyed alien, priced at 29.99 pounds ($53), doubles as a speaker for an iPod or MP3 player. When plugged into a music source, the iZ plays the music while its eyes move to the beat. It also moves on its own, burps and makes other rude noises.

 

Girls may find the Baby Annabell doll that cries real tears appealing. Other new dolls in the top 12 include Barbie's Pegasus Annika and the Bratz Rock Angelz series.

 

The Bratz dolls aim at a slightly older age, from 6 to 9, than Barbies, according to Emma Arthur of Norton and Co., a public relations agency marketing the dolls by Vivid.  The Bratz dolls are aimed at girls age 6-9, and are called ‘edgy’ and ‘attitude-driven’.

 

…So stock up on those batteries…um…or don’t…if you want some peace and quiet..!

 

{cue radio_tuner}

{cue backschool-ed}

 

CHECK THE CLOCK!!

 


Birth Mother Vs. Egg Donor Decision Upheld – STORY #6

By ROSE FRENCH

Associated Press Writer

 

A woman who gave birth to triplets using donated eggs is the legal mother of the children even though she has no genetic link to them, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

 

The court's 4-1 ruling upheld decisions by lower courts that awarded parental rights to the birth mother.

 

Cindy Culpepper and Charles Galiwango were not married when they sought to have a child by in-vitro fertilization using two anonymously donated eggs, which were fertilized with Galiwango's sperm. One of the eggs divided, resulting in triplets.

 

After the relationship deteriorated, Galiwango challenged the parental rights of his ex-girlfriend, who gave birth to the children in 2001.

 

The court said it took into consideration the fact that before the children were born, the couple intended Culpepper would be their legal mother.

 

'Recent developments in reproductive technology have caused a tectonic shift in the realities which underlie our legal conceptions of parenthood,' the court's opinion said.

 

The decision could apply a broad definition of a parent in later cases involving nontraditional parents, according to legal scholars.

 

'In most states, the courts have not looked beyond the biological connections, marriage or adoption in determining the definition of a parent,' said Susan Brooks, law professor at Vanderbilt University Law School.

 

'People who support greater rights for nontraditional parents like gay couples would be encouraged by an opinion that would define parent more broadly than simply by marriage, genetics or adoption,' she said.

 

 

 

…red alert!  The DAD was the only one with any DNA in the game here folks!  But yet his “parental” rights were ignored by the courts.  Now I’m probably gonna catch a lot of flack for this in the e-mail…but the law has favored women in divorce and child custody issues, largely due to the fact that these laws were written in the 70’s when the ‘gender gap’ existed.  Women now enjoy far more freedom than men do.  Men have three choices when it comes to family life: work, work, or – work.  Women can stay at home, be caregivers to their kids,

 

 

 


 

Experts Decry Decline of Good Manners – STORY #7

By DONNA CASSATA

Associated Press Writer

 

Americans' fast-paced, high-tech existence has taken a toll on civility. From road rage in the morning commute to high decibel cell-phone conversations that ruin dinner out, men and women behaving badly has become the hallmark of a hurry-up world.

 

An increasing informality _ flip-flops at the White House, even _ combined with self-absorbed communication gadgets and a demand for instant gratification have strained common courtesies to the breaking point.

 

'All of these things lead to a world with more stress, more chances for people to be rude to each other,' said Peter Post, a descendent of etiquette expert Emily Post and an instructor on business manners through the Emily Post Institute in Burlington, Vt.

 

In some cases, the harried single parent has replaced the traditional nuclear family and there's little time to teach the basics of polite living, let alone how to hold a knife and fork, according to Post.

 

A slippage in manners is obvious to many Americans. Nearly 70 percent questioned in an Associated Press-Ipsos poll said people are ruder than they were 20 or 30 years ago. The trend is noticed in large and small places alike, although more urban people report bad manners, 74 percent, then do people in rural areas, 67 percent.

 

Peggy Newfield, founder and president of Personal Best, said the generation that came of age in the times-a-changin' 1960s and 1970s are now parents who don't stress the importance of manners, such as opening a door for a female.

 

So it was no surprise to Newfield that those children wouldn't understand how impolite it was to wear flip-flops to a White House meeting with the president _ as some members of the Northwestern women's lacrosse team did in the summer.

 

A whopping 93 percent in the AP-Ipsos poll faulted parents for failing to teach their children well.

 

'Parents are very much to blame,' said Newfield, whose Atlanta-based company started teaching etiquette to young people and now focuses on corporate employees. 'And the media.'

 

Sulking athletes and boorish celebrities grab the headlines while television and Hollywood often glorify crude behavior.

 

'It's not like the old shows 'Father Knows Best,'' said Norm Demers, 47, of Sutton, Mass. 'People just copy it. How do you change it?' Demers would like to see more family friendly television but isn't holding his breath.

 

Nearly everyone has a story of the rude or the crude, but fewer are willing to fess up to boorish behavior themselves.

 

Only 13 percent in the poll would admit to making an obscene gesture while driving; only 8 percent said they had used their cell phones in a loud or annoying manner around others. But 37 percent in the survey of 1,001 adults questioned Aug. 22-23 said they had used a swear word in public.

 

 

…We re-enforce the ‘Please’ and ‘Thank You’ here at the Gray household.  If my son wants something, he’d better say please!  And I don’t have any problems confronting a parent whose kid is outta control, even at Chuck-E-Cheese.  I keep my own son in line, I expect others to do the same, foe their kid’s sake.

 

I have to work on my son’s habit of interrupting Mommy and me when we’re having a “discussion”…..

 

 

Now a follow-up to the SIDS topic from last week’s podcast

 

 


 

New SIDS Policy Recommends Pacifiers – STORY #8

By LINDSEY TANNER

AP Medical Writer

 

Babies should be offered pacifiers at bedtime, and they should sleep in their parents' room _ but not in their beds _ in order to lessen the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, the nation's largest group of pediatricians says.

 

Both measures may help keep babies from slumbering too deeply _ a problem for infants prone to SIDS, said Dr. Rachel Moon, who helped draft the new recommendations on SIDS prevention. They were prepared for release Monday at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

 

The death rate from SIDS has fallen sharply in recent years, now that parents are warned not to let their babies sleep on their stomachs or amid fluffy bedding or stuffed toys. But it remains the leading case of death in U.S. infants between ages 1 month and 1 year, killing more than 2,000 U.S. babies each year, and new tactics are needed to fight it, the academy said.

 

SIDS is defined as a sudden death of an infant, often while sleeping, that remains unexplained even after an autopsy and death scene examination.

 

Some breast-feeding proponents have advocated letting infants share their parents' bed to facilitate nighttime nursing and have opposed pacifier use because of concern that the devices might interfere with nursing.

 

But the academy is a longtime supporter of breast-feeding, and the new policy was crafted with that in mind. It recommends delaying pacifier use for breast-fed infants during the first month of life _ when SIDS risks are low _ 'to ensure that breast-feeding is firmly established.' And it says placing cribs near the parents' bed makes breast-feeding more convenient. Infants may be brought into the bed to nurse, but should be returned to their cribs afterward, the policy says.

 

Pacifiers offered at bedtime should not be reinserted if they fall out during sleep, should not be coated in sweet substances, and should not be forced upon infants who refuse them, the policy says.

 

The new policy, which updates the academy's 2000 SIDS guidelines, also says that the only recommended sleep position for infants is on their backs. Letting babies sleep on their sides, considered a less favorable option in the old policy, is now considered too risky to even be considered an option, because infants could roll over to their stomachs.

 

In 1992, 4,660 U.S. infant deaths were attributed to SIDS. That annual number fell to about 2,800 in 1998, thanks at least partly to the government-sponsored 'Back to Sleep' campaign launched nationwide in 1994. By 2002, the reported number had dropped to 2,295.

 

'Over 2,000 babies a year are still dying. We should be able to do something about that,' said Dr. John Kattwinkel of the University of Virginia, chairman of the academy's SIDS task force.

 

Doctors think actual numbers are higher because some true SIDS deaths are being blamed on other causes, said Moon, a SIDS researcher at Children's National Medical Center in Washington, D.C. Data suggest, for example, that accidental suffocation, which is hard to distinguish from SIDS, has increased in recent years, Moon said.

 

Doctors aren't sure about SIDS causes but a prevailing theory suggests that brain stem abnormalities affecting arousal reflexes leave some babies vulnerable when faced with challenges during deep sleep, including overheating and breathing hampered by pillows, stuffed animals or other soft objects. Babies sleeping on their stomachs are at risk because they sleep more deeply and their airway risks being partly obstructed.

 

 

…Don’t know what causes SIDS?? Here’s a theory…How ‘bout the fact that young kids fall asleep so deeply at night, you could call it a COMA!  I tried to wake my son up at 2 am for a trip we were taking – uh-uh, not possible.  He was out, and there was nothing I could do to wake him up.  Although I didn’t try smelling salts……


 

GeoPocket: A Classroom Tool for the GameBoy Generation – STORY #9

 

Newswise - Keeping students alert and engaged is a constant challenge for professors who teach large lecture courses. Even when the lecturer is a dynamic speaker and the presentation is peppered with compelling images and gee-whiz demonstrations, students are still mostly passive listeners.

 

Not so in University of Michigan classes where the GeoPocket project is underway. Students in Global Change I and Extreme Weather courses use wireless Pocket PCs (handheld computers) or their personal laptops to manipulate data, respond to professors' queries and explore maps, diagrams and photos, all while class is going on.

 

"In a way, we're trying to integrate laboratory experiences into the classroom environment without taking up the entire class," said U-M professor of geological sciences and professor of the environment Ben van der Pluijm, who developed the GeoPocket with Perry Samson, professor of atmospheric, oceanic and space sciences, and Peter Knoop, a School of Information research investigator.

 

The teaching tool is ideal for students who are used to spending their leisure hours playing hand-held computer games, listening to music on MP3 players and text-messaging their friends, said van der Pluijm.

 

"The kids using this are accustomed to technology, and they're accustomed to multitasking---they can interact with things and listen at the same time," he said. "This is a way for them to play with the material that's being presented in class. But it's not just play; they're learning something in the process."

 

Using handheld computers in the classroom isn't entirely new. Other devices have been used as "clickers" to allow students to respond to simple yes/no or multiple-choice questions and then compare their answers with those of their classmates. But GeoPocket applications add new dimensions, quite literally, by making use of spatial information. For example, if van der Pluijm is discussing why the Earth is colder in northern areas than around the Equator and explaining that it has to do with the angle at which sunlight strikes the planet, students can fiddle with an animated diagram, dragging a cartoon flashlight to make it shine on a surface at different angles. As they drag the flashlight, the solution to an equation that describes the relationship shows the effect.

 

In another GeoPocket exercise, van der Pluijm asks students to point out, on a map on their screens, the primary sources of the world's oil supply. Their answers are recorded centrally, and the students can click on "Show All Answers" to see their classmates' responses. The answers can also be projected for the whole class to see. The professor can then use that information as a jumping off point for a class discussion. "You can point out that they're right or wrong, but better yet, it's the perfect platform to explore the topic at hand," van der Pluijm said. "You can also pose a question and tell the students to talk to their neighbors before they answer, so that you encourage them to interact with one another."

 

The students' responses also alert the professor to points the class doesn't understand. "It gives you a sense of what registers and what does not, and it allows you to change gears while you're right there in class," van der Pluijm said.

 

Class participation and attendance both increase when students use the interactive devices, van der Pluijm said. "That may be related to the fact that we keep track of who answers questions, and the students know that we're keeping track. But the bottom line is that you learn more by being in class than not being in class, and we think this is a complementary way for them to experience the material."

 

In June, the U-M team received $125,000 in equipment from the Hewlett-Packard Company for the GeoPocket project.

 

 

..Are we helping the situation, or are we caving to short-attention-span?  I like games, but I don’t know about encouraging distracted behavior in the classroom, especially when kids are learning skills to enter the workforce…

 

 

 


NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Nintendo game enthusiasts now have a new hangout.- STORY #10

 

The video game manufacturer is expected to unveil its plan for free wireless Internet access at McDonald's restaurants for its handheld game system, according to a report published Tuesday in The New York Times.

 

The new service would allow Nintendo DS owners to play other gamers online at the fast-food chain.

 

"This is such an interesting direction for McDonald's," Anita Frazier, an entertainment industry analyst with the research firm NPD Group, said.  "This could encourage kids to go to McDonald's to play games. It is like the kids' version of Starbucks' wireless hot spots."

 

Approximately 2.2 million Nintendo DS units have been sold in the U.S. since it was released in November, the Times reported.

 

McDonald's currently offers customers wireless Internet access for laptops in 6,000 of its restaurants, although it is for a fee, according to the newspaper. Wayport, the Texas-based firm that provides McDonald's with its Wi-Fi service, will provide wireless access for the DS.

 

According to the Times, Mario Kart DS and Tony Hawk's American SK8Land will be the first two titles offered.

 

 

 

…heck with kids, I’m taking my DS and heading down to the golden arches!!!

 

That wipes out the news….

 

{cue drop___________________________________}

{cue song #1________________________________}

{cue Mailtime}

 

Do Mailtime segment

 

 

 


Liberal Govt's Child Care Discriminates Against 85% of Canadian Parents – STORY #11 - HOLD

Social Development Minister Ken Dryden implies daycare superior to parents looking after own children

 

OTTAWA, October 18, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Last week, Human Resources Minister Belinda Stronach was in Saskatchewan to re-announce government funding for childcare training. The Liberal government has promised to spend $5 billion dollars to build a national system of institutional childcare.  The Liberal plan supports only one choice - 9am to 5pm institutional childcare - that leaves thousands of parents behind, such as shift workers, parents who live in rural areas and stay-at-home parents

 

Local Conservative MP Maurice Vellacott regrets that Stronach did not use the opportunity to make a commitment to the priorities and values of all Canadian parents. "The Liberal government thus continues to discriminate against 85% of Canadian parents," said Vellacott.

 

In a Vanier Institute study this year, daycare centres ranked a distant 5th when Canadians were asked who they would prefer to care for their pre-school children. A parent, grandparent, another relative and home daycare all ranked higher. "Does the Liberal government believe in freedom and choice or is it trying to coerce Canadians into their discriminatory funding scheme?" asked Vellacott.

 

The Conservative Party's alternative, according to their website is straightforward and simple.  "We will give money directly to all parents so they can make their own childcare choices," it says.

 

The Saskatchewan MP is even more shocked at the Orwellian nature of comments by Social Development Minister Ken Dryden. This summer, Dryden tussled with New Brunswick because the province wanted to use federal funds for a more universal and equitable childcare scheme. Dryden said government funds could theoretically be available to parents if they received training to "meet the standards of regulation." "Dryden's implication is clear," said Vellacott. "Liberal-regulated daycare is superior to the childcare parents give to their own children."

 

"As a Conservative MP, I completely renounce this bigoted smear against the majority of Canadian parents in my riding and across the country," stressed Vellacott. "Quality childcare is critical to Canada's economic and social well-being, and parents are in the best position to determine how to care for their children - not the federal government."

 

Vellacott does not dispute the importance of quality training for childcare workers, but he notes the recent work of Australian feminist writer Anne Manne who explains that love and care are different. Caring is reproducible, she says, but parental love is not. "Severing that bond of love through excessive taxation policies that force all parents to fund a very narrow childcare agenda is inexcusable," said Vellacott.

 

 

…Listeners in Canada, please e-mail me and let me know what government official an ‘MP’ is.  Here in the USA it means ‘military police’…I doubt it’s the same in Canada.

 

Anyway, I wanted to bring this story to parents’ attention, because things of this sort have been tried in the USA, and I’m sure other countries have tried the same.  Day care is fine, but MANDATORY CHILD CARE!?!  This article is overly-political, to be sure, but the implication is clear – we’re the government and we know how to raise your kids better than YOU do!  I for one will not stand for this kind of government involvement in my life or my kid’s life.  If I were a Canadian citizen, I’d be making some phone calls and writing some letters….

 

 

 


 

 

Can a Child's Final Adult Height Actually Be Predicted? – STORY #12 - HOLD

Newswise - Children pass through growth phases at various points during adolescence before reaching final adult height. Some children begin their growth phases early on while others are "late bloomers." Many parents and children may be curious to know how tall the child will be as an adult. A study in the October issue of The Journal of Pediatrics describes an inexpensive and noninvasive method for parents and doctors to predict a child's adult height based on sex and growth factors.

 

Lauren Sherar, MSc and colleagues from the University of Saskatchewan in Canada and the Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences in Belgium assessed height and weight from previous studies of 224 boys and 120 girls aged 8-16 years. "Early bloomers" tend to grow at a faster rate and reach their adult height before "late bloomers." On average, however, girls tend to reach their peak height at 12 years of age, and boys reach their peak at 14 years. The researchers estimated when a child would reach peak height and made their predictions according to each child's age, sex, weight, growth maturity level, sitting height, and standing height. By adding the child's present height to how many centimeters (cm) the child has to grow, the authors were able to predict the final height of boys within a 5.4 cm range and a 6.8 cm range for girls.

 

Because children can be insecure about their adolescent height, predicting their adult height can play a role in their physical and social well-being. Ms. Sherar explains that "this technique is a valid, non-intrusive, inexpensive, and simple method of predicting adult height in adolescent children, free of growth limiting diseases." Caregivers can try this technique at home by entering in required information about their child at http://www.usask.ca/kinesiology/research_index.php .

 

…I tried this.  I got an error message – child should be at least 7 years of age…blah blah.

 

Here’s what you need to know before you visit the site;

 

Birth date, today’s date, their height standing, their height sitting, and their weight.  You can use English or metric units of measure.  Now remember: its only 92% accurate!  Don’t get all freaked out if your numbers reveal your kid will be a mutant or something!

 

 

 


Baby Wipes Use #23 - Anti-static cleaner-upper

 

Due to recent health developments (namely the fact that my wife and I have allergies to just about everything you can have allergies to) we have taken on the monumental task of removing all sources of allergens from our environment.  We’ve been told that since WE have allergies, its very likely that our son does, too.

 

Of course, all of our friends have opinions on just how to accomplish the decontamination process.

 

One friend suggested we buy this fancy-schmancy vacuum cleaner that removes 99.5% of allergens from the air, or so it says.  It makes no such claim about removing allergens from the CARPET, mind you!  Isn’t that odd.  I generally don’t use a vacuum cleaner to clean the air, although it is a novel idea.

 

Instead, we use a silent, high-tech, ZENION-effect, hypo-allergenic electro-static air cleaner.  We ordered this on the internet from one of those catchy, trendy, high-tech mail-order places that advertises night and day and between their ads and friends pestering us to get one of these gizmos, they plain wore us down and we gave in…so I bought two.

 

I take issue with the manufacturer’s claim of SILENT operation, though.  These things do makes a noticeable hiss.  It has no fans, and air just comes out of it, smelling like the outdoors after a thunderstorm – you know, musty and charged with electricity that makes your hair stand on end.

 

It makes noises like the thunderstorm itself, actually.  When the “collection grid” collects enough dirt on it, the “grid” resembles a chia pet, fuzzy with dust and stuff I would otherwise be sucking into my lungs, and the device starts making little static-shock-type-noises, it sounds like lightning bottled up in a fan.

 

I’m supposed to pull these grids out of the cleaner when it starts making these noises to clean them.  These grids have warnings all over them, “DO NOT IMMERSE IN WATER”, “DO NOT PLACE IN – brand name deleted – WHEN WET” and so on and so on.  I don’t like handling these fuzzy lint-covered chia-pet-like grids when they’re dirty, but I have to clean them SOMEHOW. 

 

Wipes to the rescue!  The so-called “grids” are actually these long, polished flat stainless steel plates that get charged with static electricity and attract the dust in the air to them.  Problem is, static is like glue for dust, so getting these grids clean is a nightmare.  And I can’t get ‘em wet?!  How am I supposed to clean em?  Out of frustration, I used baby wipes – lots of wipes – to polish the surfaces to a nice high shine again.  No more static zaps like a mosquito trap in the middle of the night while I’m trying to sleep, just that hiss of air, that gentle breeze soothing us to sleep with the “zenion effect”.

 

{Cue Drop______________________________}

{Cue Song #3___________________________}

 

We’re All Wipes out for this week’s show…..my thanks to _______________________________________________

From Garageband.com, and _________________________________________ from the podsafe music network, that’s music.podshow.com.

 

 


Mailtime…!

Again, thanks to everybody for listening and for subscribing.  Comments, suggestions, gripes, whatever – e-mail to submit-at-1-0-1-uses-for-baby-wipes-dot-com.  Skype me at USESFORWIPES, or call 805-MAIL-610, 805-624-5610.

 

Darren Swartzendruber writes…

Another great episode! First time I have heard the Tune Test -- great, loved it. My kids will love listening to this episode (I subject them to podcasts in the car).

 

…Well, I try not to think of my podcasts as something to be subjected to…I hope…have fun, kids!  Enjoy the toon-test coming up in just a few!

 

John wrote to set me straight on the Wallace&Grommit situation…

The WAREHOUSE was all that burned down, and I didn’t make that clear.  The older sets from older shows done at AArdman were destroyed, not the sets and props from the newest movie – IN THEATRES NOW – Curse of the Were-Rabbit.

 

Fat Jeff (he calls himself that, I’m not labeling anyone here!) writes from Ewa Beach, Hawaii,

Aloha,

I'm been listening for a few episodes and am totally enjoying the "Daddy Cast". Besides all the thought provoking parenting information I also like the OTHER STUFF. Music? Yes! Include it. Interviews that aren't all  hard core parenting info, you bet! Balances the show out, adds to the entertainment factor. The music test...I was 1 for 3, only knew Sponge

Bob Squarepants. But hey, I'll improve in time...my is only 8 weeks old, not too much into the TV yet. Although I have caught him seemingly sneaking a peek at "Lost" the other night.

 

ADHD...Ritalin...never seemed to help my Nephew...although as lazy as he is maybe a stimulant would help. Or it could just be he's a typical 16 year old.

 

Y’know I’ve not been to Hawaiianyway, thanks for writing, Jeff.  By the way, you’re this week’s toontest winner with a score of one out of three (only because he was the ONLY ONE to send me a score!).  I have your e-mail address, and as soon as I can con some company into sponsoring this show, I’ll be sending prizes…I promise.

 

Jeff owns a small business that distributes ballons – n – things to gift and florist shops in the Honolulu area…so, if any listeners out there are in need of Balloons-N-Things, look my friend Jeff up…That’s Balloons-N-Things in Honolulu, Hawaii.  Thanks, Jeff for the e-mail.

 

Molglorf writes…

 

Thanks for the podcast Dennis.

Two things: You asked about movies for babies in other parts of the world. Here in New Brunswick, Canada, they have "Reel Babies" once a month, and my wife attends them every time.

Also, for the music, leave it in. I for one really enjoy it, and on the other hand: IT’S YOUR SHOW. If you feel that it adds to the experience, leave it in. People who don’t want to listen can fast forward. (Although it may help to add chapters to your podcast.)

 

David in Santa Monica writes…

Movies with Babies in Santa Monica... See you there!

 

So there’s this whole world to moviegoing that I just had no clue about…I really need to get the local theatres involved with these matinees for kids.  Its kinda sexist though, targeting moms only!  I’d take my son, but not if I’m gonna be the only guy in the place!

 

Kenneth from Germany (not Ken, they don’t abbreviate in Europe, I remember) writes…

Hey there,Great show - wanna get that remote for my 3-year old boy.  Do you know if we can get the remote for kids "weemode"?) in Europe.  Do you have the manufacturer's or sales agent's website?  Highly appreciated,

Kenneth Madsen, Ebenhausen, Germany.

 

You bet, Kenneth – its www.weemote.com...great product! My son loves his!  I’m just not sure if it works in Europe or not.

{cue drop_________________________________}

{cue Song #2______________________________}

{Cue Drop________________________________}

Time for the ToonTest

{cue Evan-Play it}  {Cue ToonTest}