Episode 121 Notes

 

[Cue Episode Synth Voice]

[Cue extra lead-in Wizard of OZ brain]

[Cue Intro]

 

Banter:  Hello daddy-castaways, welcome to the hangover, week-after new-year daddycast!  I really need to think of a good name to call regular listeners to this program.  Daddy castaways sounds kinda like the Gilligan’s Island fan club.  Any ideas, please e-mail me.  Guess I’m gonna have to post the e-mail address on the web site again – COME GET ME SPAM WARRIORS!

 

I took my son to Burger King yesterday.  If you have small kids, you’ve probably noticed that their appetites are not steady, and certainly DO NOT peak around breakfast, lunch, or dinner.  They get hungry one day, then they may not eat for 2 or 3 days…just depends.  Our pediatrician told us and I quote, “Its not the parents responsibility to get their kids to eat.  They will eat when they’re ready”.  Well, my wife and I can tell, just by how Evan eats his breakfast, whether today will be an ‘eat day’ or a ‘no eat day’.  When it’s a no-eat day, he’ll turn his nose up at his favorite foods.  But when its an eat-day, watch out for your livestock!  He’ll eat everything we put in front of him, and ask for more.

 

Anyway, We had already eaten dinner, I was running errands and my son tagged along for the ride.  Evan was still hungry, and chewing on his hands in the car – a sure sign of an ‘eat-day’, so I stopped at Burger King and got him a snack.  I kept the box – they’re called ‘Chicken Fries’ – they’re like long chicken nuggets that have been cooked a little longer, that’s all.  The food at Burger King does not appeal to me, but my son loves it.  What intrigued me was the marketing and packaging.  I kept the box the Chicken Fries came in, just so I could read this sales blurb on the back to you, {read box} Who thinks up this stuff?  I already bought it…why not tell me what’s in it instead of how or who to eat it with.

 

We got a new Toontest this week, a new geeky baby wipes use – which I came up with out of desperation, as usual, and lots o’ news – although it was a quiet week for the kind of news we feature on the podcast.  Everybody is focused on COMDEX, and the MacWorld Expo next week, so all the journalists who normally cover the ‘baby beat’ are all geeking out in Las Vegas.

 

Google announced they’re gonna sell videos now.  Just what we need – a search engine selling out-of-date content for 99 cents.  Or a buck 99, or whatever.  Bill Gates is getting into the music business with ‘Urge’.  Kinda late there Bill.  eBay wants to be your telephone company.  All these companies are racing to make the jump out of your PC and into your house.  I said it before – “Television puts people in your living room that you wouldn’t invite into your home”.

[Cue News_Theme]

 

Headlines: FDA studies ADD, Schools tell parents to ‘pay up to log on’, Parents worry again about saving for College,  Think your SUV is safer?, Court throws out vouchers.  Stay Tuned…

 

 

[Cue Sample_17]

[Cue PSA ‘Ref’]

 

[Cue News_Bulletin]

[Cue Synth News Intro]


 

News:

FDA to Examine New Ways to Study ADD Drugs

 

Reports of sudden deaths, strokes, heart attacks and hypertension in both children and adults taking drugs to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder are spurring new government study into the medications' safety. Sales of drugs to treat ADHD have increased sharply in recent years, with use growing at a faster rate among adults than children, according to a recent study by Medco Health Solutions, a prescription benefit manager. Spending on ADHD drugs soared from $759 million in 2000 to $3.1 billion in 2004, according to IMS Health, a pharmaceutical information and consulting firm.

 

The Food and Drug Administration said it had received reports of what it called 'serious adverse events' _ including deaths _ in association with the therapeutic use of the drugs. No additional details on those events were immediately available.

 

The FDA's Canadian counterpart, Health Canada, yanked the ADHD drug Adderall XR from the market for six months last year in response to reports of 20 sudden deaths and 12 strokes in adults and children using the drug. A number of the cases involved children with structural heart defects.

 

The panel eventually concluded there was inadequate evidence of increased harm from Adderall XR compared with other available therapies _ a conclusion the FDA also reached based on data on hand.

 

Now the U.S. regulatory agency is asking its Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committee to examine ways of studying further the potential cardiovascular risks of the drugs. The few studies that have looked at longer-term use of ADHD drugs provide little information on those risks, the FDA said.

 

'It almost sounds like cox-2 inhibitor redux,' said committee chairman Dr. Peter Gross, referring to cox-2 painkillers like Vioxx and Bextra pulled from the market because of evidence they can raise the risk of a heart attack or stroke.

 

The committee is to meet Feb. 9 and 10 in Gaithersburg, Md.

 

'The issue of drug treatment of attention deficit disorder in children has been a controversial one without this issue of cardiovascular risk too. It adds another concern to what will certainly be an interesting conversation,' said Arthur Levin, the FDA committee's consumer representative.

 

A posting to the FDA Web site did not identify any of the drugs by name. However, the most commonly used ADHD drugs include Adderall XR, made by Shire Pharmaceuticals, and Ritalin, made by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Various other companies make generic versions of Ritalin as well.

 

The committee's Feb. 10 meeting will include updates on FDA actions on cox-2 drugs as well as a recently begun patient, doctor and pharmacist registry program for the anti-acne drug Accutane and its generic competitors.

 

 

Hmm…A study to study a study…Boy, this is scary.  BUT - If there is a risk to sudden death from taking these drugs, you gotta be asking yourself is it worth the risk.  My mom WAS taking vioxx for arthritis, and she very unhappy about that drug being pulled.  She had none of the side-effects and had been taking the drug for some time.  But hey – this is why DOCTORS need to be actively involved, and not just tossing prescriptions at us.  So if your kids are on Ritalin, you may want to ask your kid’s doctor about the risks…and if he doesn’t know – you may want to find another doctor.

Schools ask parents to pay up before kids log on

By William M. Welch, USA TODAY

FULLERTON, CA

 

The public school system in this quiet city 27 miles southeast of Los Angeles is pushing the frontiers of computer technology in the classroom with a program that puts a laptop computer into the backpacks of children as early as first grade. It is pushing the boundaries of financing, too, by asking parents to pay $500 a year for three years so each of more than 2,000 elementary and middle school children can have their own Apple iBook G4 laptop.

 

An increasing number of school systems are using computers in the core curriculum of early grades. Don Knezek, CEO of the International Society for Technology in Education, a non-profit group in Washington, says one laptop per student is the hottest trend in educational computing.

 

But asking parents to pay for it isn't.

 

"I can see where that issue raises concerns," he says. "I'm not aware of anyone else who has tried that."

 

The Fullerton program, at four of 20 district schools, has created a storm of controversy for the school system and its superintendent, Cameron McCune. It also has raised broader questions about how far public schools here and elsewhere can go in using costly technology in the face of tight school budgets and limited funding.

 

Some parents worry that whatever its educational benefits, the program has created an expensive burden for struggling families and has forged new divisions in the public schools.

 

Sutherland, who kept her 11-year-old daughter out of the program, is concerned that it creates "a horrible form of financial segregation."

 

"It's mind-boggling that they would even suggest such a thing," Sutherland says.

 

Some parents say the financial expectations and price tag violate California's constitutional guarantee of a free public education — a principle also in other state constitutions. The parents are threatening a lawsuit and have enlisted the help of the American Civil Liberties Union.

 

"The California constitution is very, very clear: My children attend a free public school," Sandra Dingess says.

 

Dingess moved three of her four children to another school within the district to avoid the big computer bill and what she says was the embarrassment her children faced from being unable to pay. Her fourth child, an eighth-grader, remained in the program for a final year.

 

McCune, who created the program, acknowledges that his school system is trying something controversial, but he says lower-income families can get help paying for the computers. "In all four schools, nobody has been denied access because of a lack of ability to pay."

 

There are other concerns. Some parents say transferring to another school is not fair. Others object to requests for tax returns and financial records to obtain aid. "We don't think you have the right to ask for that information," Dingess says. "You're not the IRS. You're a public school."

 

Schools have come a long way in embracing technology in the past decade. More than 99% of public schools had Internet access by 2002, according to federal statistics. It is commonplace for even elementary classrooms to have one or more computers.

 

Students seem to like the brave new world, though what they're learning may not be so educational. In Fullerton, computers are used in all subjects and as much as 60% of the class work. Some of what they learn is how to e-mail friends and download music.

 

"It was fun to have around and to use for my own purposes," says Riley Hall, 13, who was in the program last year but transferred to another school for eighth grade. "But it didn't make school any better or more challenging. ... A lot of it at school was to show off what you know about computers."

 

- $1500 macs? – set-up a lab – charge lab fees if you have to – 1st graders with laptops? – yeah that’s smart!


Parents Worry Most About College Savings

By EILEEN ALT POWELL

AP Business Writer

 

All those reports about the rising cost of a college education appear to be having an impact on the savings patterns of American families.

 

A survey finds that parents with children under age 18 are more concerned about saving for their children's educations than they are about saving for retirement.

 

The study was commissioned by The Vanguard Group mutual fund company, which is based in Valley Forge, Pa., and Upromise Investments Inc. of Needham, Mass., which channels shopping rebates into educational savings accounts.

 

The survey found that 37 percent of the more than 1,100 parents who were interviewed said saving for college was of primary concern, compared with 34 percent who said retirement was their top financial concern. The rest said that saving for a house, car or other major purchase was most important.

 

Interestingly, more families with children under age 12 were saving for college _ 64 percent _ compared with families with children aged 12 to 17, where the rate was 59 percent, the study found. And 30 percent of families with younger children said that grandparents and other relatives were helping them to save, compared with 25 percent of families with older children.

 

John Heywood, a principal of Vanguard's education markets group, said he suspected parents were motivated by surging college costs.

 

'I believe people are recognizing the increasing costs of college and starting to save earlier,' Heywood said.

 

The cost of sending children to college has been rising fast in recent years. According to the latest survey from the College Board, a nonprofit association based in Washington, D.C., tuition and fees at four-year private institutions rose nearly 6 percent to $21,235 for the 2005-2006 academic year from $20,045 in 2004-2005, while costs at four-year public institutions went up more than 7 percent to $5,491 from $5,126.

 

Most financial advisers urge families to save first for their own retirement and then put money aside for their kids' education, arguing that families can borrow to fund college but not retirement. But Heywood said this conflicts with parents' aspirations for their children.

 

'People hear that and they say, 'Too bad about retirement savings; my kids are going to college.''

 

He added that for young families, 'retirement is farther off than the kids going to college, so there's less urgency.'

 

The families who have started saving for their children's college educations have set aside about $4,700 per child so far, the study found.

 

It said that about four out of 10 families were familiar with the Section 529 college savings plans, which are tax-favored programs set up by states to help families save for college. Savings in 529 plans grow tax-deferred, and withdrawals are tax-free when used for education.

 

 

…the sooner you start, the better…and the less burden there is on the family.  Kid still in diapers?  Go start a college fund.  We did, my dad has one st-up.  By the time my son is old enough, there’ll be college money waiting, probably enough to even pay living expenses.  Gotta love compound interest.

 

Here on the daddycast, I’ve been throwing little segments in when I talk with my friend Matthew Brown.  He lives and breathes investing – runs in his blood.  His father was an investment broker – and I gather a bit of a workaholic from what Matthew has said.  Anyway, we have mutual funds that we move money into and out of.  We have a 401(k) plan at work that allows us to move money between funds without paying fees.  So Matthew watches the market and we move money into funds when the market is going up, and out of funds and into a money market account (basically a cash account) when the market falls.  It’s the old ‘buy low, sell high’ trick.  With Matthew’s help, my 401(k) plan has doubled in 2 years.  He’s good – really good.  And we get together and talk about this stuff often.  So when we do, I’ll bring it to ya to help you save for your kids college education.  We’re not professional investors, OK?  We just talk about the market over a beer.  So think of it like we’re talking to YOU over a beer about stocks – not giving professional advice.  ‘Nuff said?
Study Shows Children No Safer in SUVs

By JAN DENNIS

Associated Press Writer

 

Children are no safer riding in sport utility vehicles than in passenger cars, largely because the doubled risk of rollovers in SUVs cancels out the safety advantages of their greater size and weight, according to a study.

 

Researchers said the findings dispel the bigger-equals-safer myth that has helped fuel the growing popularity of SUVs among families. SUV registrations climbed 250 percent in the United States between 1995 and 2002.

 

'We're not saying they're worse or that they're terrible vehicles. We're challenging the conventional wisdom that everyone assumed they were better,' said Dr. Dennis Durbin, a pediatric emergency physician who took part in the study, published Tuesday in the journal Pediatrics.

 

Eron Shosteck, a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said he had not seen the study but cited government research released last summer that found SUVs have become less top-heavy since 2000 and made dramatic improvements in rollover resistance.

 

'SUVs have an exceptional safety record and are safer than or as safe as cars in the vast majority of crashes,' Shosteck said.

 

The study, which Durbin called the first on SUVs and child safety, was sponsored by Partners for Child Passenger Safety, a research project of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the world's largest insurer, Bloomington-based State Farm Insurance Co.

 

The researchers looked at accidents involving nearly 4,000 children under age 16 between 2000 and 2003, and found child injury rates of about 1.7 percent in both cars and SUVs. The study examined only 1998 or newer cars and SUVs with second-generation air bags.

 

On average, the SUVs weighed 1,300 pounds more than the cars studied. The study found that the extra weight of SUVs enhanced safety, reducing the risk of injury by more than a third.

 

But that was offset by findings that SUVs were more than twice as likely as cars to roll over in crashes.

 

Children in rollovers were three times more likely to be seriously injured than those in non-rollover accidents, according to the study.

 

The findings surprised researchers, who assumed heavier SUVs were safer than cars when they launched the study a year ago, Durbin said.

 

SUV safety will probably improve because of legislation approved by Congress this year that requires the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to develop standards for automakers to address SUV rollovers, he said.

 

'To the extent that SUV makers can solve the rollover problem, we may see them becoming the safe haven for children that they have the potential to be,' Durbin said.

 

Automakers already have made strides through engineering and new technology such as electronic stability control, Shosteck said.

 

NHTSA spokesman Rae Tyson agreed but said he hopes the study will encourage families to check safety ratings closely before buying.

 

'I think there is a segment of the buying public that may be buying them with the false impression that they are buying the safest vehicle they can for their families,' Tyson said.

 

…If you can buy a Hummer, buy one.  Buy a used Sherman TANK if you can make it street-legal.  Your family is THE MOST IMPORTANT CARGO YOU HAVE.  Studies or no studies.  I have been in three collisions with my son in the car.  2 of those were in an SUV.  Both times the OTHER CAR was totaled and had to be towed away. (It was also the other guy’s fault in both of them).  And, in both cases, my son WAS NOT HURT…NOT ONE BIT.  I own an SUV and a big ol’ made-in-the-USA pickup truck, which took out a deer – y’know, Bambi – on the freeway.  I talked about it before on the show.  I forget which episode…one of the early ones.  Point is, no compact cars for me – not anymore…I’m a DAD NOW…

Florida Supreme Court throws out vouchers

 

Voucher schools are not subject to the same regulations that apply to public schools.

 

The Florida Supreme Court knocked the wind out of Gov. Jeb Bush's education revamp Thursday, ruling that the private-school voucher program violates the state Constitution's promise of a "uniform system of free public schools."

 

Watched nationwide, the 5-2 decision topples Opportunity Scholarships, the only statewide voucher program in the country. It also raises doubts about two related voucher programs.

 

The ruling shatters the biggest stick Bush wielded to boost performance - the ability to use tax dollars to leave a failing public school for a private one.

 

Vouchers are "one of the most important reasons why we have seen rising student achievement," Bush said at a news conference in Tallahassee. "I think it's a sad day for accountability in our state."

 

This year, only about 700 of Florida's 2.7-million public school students took advantage of Opportunity Scholarships.

Though the numbers are small, the policy implications have always been huge.

 

Supporters, including a long line of conservative think tanks and interest groups, say vouchers have motivated struggling public schools to perform better through competition. A couple of recent academic studies, including one by researchers at Harvard University, back up that claim.

 

But opponents, led by the state's teachers union, say vouchers drain money from public schools - an argument echoed by the Supreme Court majority as well as Democratic candidates for governor. They also say vouchers unfairly malign public schools and violate constitutional restrictions separating church and state.

 

Thursday's ruling is "a victory for public schools in Florida," said Ron Meyer, a Tallahassee attorney who argued the case on behalf of the Florida Education Association. "It means that Florida taxpayers will not be forced to pay for (private) schools which are unaccountable."

 

Filed one day after Bush signed the program into law in 1999, Bush vs. Holmes has been colored ever since by religious and racial overtones. The vast majority of students using Opportunity Scholarships are black or Hispanic, and polls show strong support in minority communities for voucher programs. At the same time, the case has raised thorny questions regarding the constitutionality of sending public money to religious schools, which make up the majority of those accepting vouchers.

 

For some families, though, vouchers were not policy but personal. Andy Cameron, 55, of Pensacola, whose son Ramon attended a Catholic school for five years, said vouchers enabled his son to get a better education. Ramon was a fourth-grader when a local factory closed and Cameron lost his job. Without a voucher, he couldn't afford to send his son to a private school.

 

"It gave us a choice, which we didn't have before," Cameron said. "The schools that Ramon was in, before, were in pretty rough condition. The kids didn't even have access to books to take home."

 

Cameron said he is a Democrat, and disagrees with Bush on some of his policies. "But on the voucher program, I backed him 100 percent," he said.

 

Lower courts had ruled against the program on religious grounds, but the Supreme Court steered wide of that argument. Instead, a majority found that vouchers violate a state constitutional provision that voters enacted in 1998, for a "uniform, efficient, safe, secure and high quality system of free public schools."

 

The justices turned the accountability argument upside down, noting voucher schools are not subject to the same rigorous state regulations that apply to public schools. That, they wrote, violates the constitutional mandate for a "uniform" public school system.

 

"We recognize that the proponents of vouchers have a strongly held view that students should have choices. Our decision does not deny parents recourse to either public or private school alternatives to a failing school," said the 35-page ruling, authored by Chief Justice Barbara Pariente. "Only when the private school option depends upon public funding is choice limited."

 

The two dissenting justices, Kenneth Bell and Raoul Cantero, are Bush appointees. In a dissent Bell wrote, they said it was wrong to conclude that public schools are the "exclusive means" for the state to educate every child.

 

Legal scholars said there are no grounds for Bush to appeal successfully to the U.S. Supreme Court. There are no federal issues involved.

 

But Bush did not rule out an appeal and vowed to pursue every strategy to keep vouchers alive, including raising money from private sources.

 

The court decision is "so, so bad," said Barbara Cruz, whose 18-year-old daughter uses a voucher to attend La Progresiva Presbyterian School in Miami. The court ruling said students currently using Opportunity Scholarships will be able to keep them through the end of the school year. So Cruz's daughter, a senior, won't have to go back.

 

But Cruz echoed the concerns of other voucher parents, who said their children made better grades and focused more after getting away from public schools they considered overcrowded and unsafe.

 

"She made the biggest turnaround," Cruz said.

 

Republican lawmakers are already discussing ways to reconstruct the voucher program and are expected to seek remedies during the legislative session that starts March 7.

 

"Solutions are imminent," said state Rep. Dennis Baxley, R-Ocala, who chairs the House Education Council.

 

One possibility: Modeling Opportunity Scholarships after a related program, in which businesses get tax credit for donating their state corporate taxes to scholarship funding organizations for vouchers. That program was not directly affected by Thursday's ruling.

 

Another possibility: a constitutional amendment.

 

"I don't think any option should be taken off the table," Bush said.

 

Democrats welcomed the court decision - and a renewed legislative debate.

 

"The Florida Constitution requires that you take care of your public school system before you start frolicking in private school systems, and clearly, we are not taking care of our public schools adequately," said Rep. Dan Gelber, D-Miami Beach. "I think the Republicans need to let go of this fixation with vouchers."

 

Both Republican candidates for governor, Chief Financial Officer Tom Gallagher and Attorney General Charlie Crist, criticized the ruling, while both Democratic candidates - U.S. Rep. Jim Davis of Tampa and state Sen. Rod Smith of Alachua - praised it.

 

…Well, the lines are pretty clearly drawn in Florida.  If you believe in school choice, and options for getting your kids into private schools, the Florida Democrats are not on your side.  On the other hand, if you believe that the public school should be fixed, and not have money bled from it by vouchers, then the Florida Republicans are not on your side.

 

Considering that only 700 students used the scholarships out of 2.7 million students, I fail to see the Democrat’s point on this one.  I agree that the public school system is, for the most part, broken.  But in Florida’s case, it sounds like only people who really needed to get their kids into something else were using the program.  700 out of 2.7 million is a statistically insignificant number, and probably had no impact on school funding.  The whole voucher issue has become a political football used to cast blame – in MY opinion.  Get over who’s at fault for the bad test scores, the dropout rates, the dilapidated classrooms – and just fix the friggin’ problem…or let parents move their kids.  Tax dollars belong to the PEOPLE – not the government.

 

When I was single, I used to grumble at the high property taxes I was paying, 80% of which went to the public schools.  That was about 2,000 a year.  Now its closer to 3,000 and I’m figuring that the public school is a BARGAIN!  My son has ggod teachers, but of course the only way I’d know that is because I checked all this out MYSELF.

 

I’m very lucky.  Where we live, we have a very good, and very small, public school district.  The district isn’t big enough to be a political stepping stone for some politician on a mission.

 

 

…And that wipes out the news…

 

[Cue drop ELEMENT_2]

Here’s an Ode to a household Appliance – Jonathon Coulton

[Cue Song 1 “Jonathon Coulton – “Shop Vac”]

 

I think that is my new Anthem for Suburbia…Jonathon Coulton and ‘Shop Vac’.  C’mon guys…you really identify with this song, don’t ya?  And I thought I was cynical…

 

[Cue Mailtime]

Comments, questions, please send ‘em – I read ‘em all – to submit at 101 uses for baby wipes dot com.  Or use Skype – the ID is USESFORWIPES.  I had a guy connect to my Skype today and ask to be on my contacts list.  He’s from Austria and doesn’t speak very much English.  My German was terrible – but we had a nice talk about the weather.  It’s minus 2 Celsius in Vienna today.

 

From John In Maine:

Just listened to the last daddycast and heard your info about getting exercise in the winter months. Must be easier for you, being in CA, but up here in Maine it's more difficult. Of course, when the weather is nicer, we've started a new activity with the kids - geocaching. I call it 'treasure hunting' to the kids and they love going through the treasure troves we find. The hiking takes a while for them to get used to and if it's a long hike, then we have attention span issues, but Iplan for 3x the hike time to be able to stop enough and look at what we're walking through.

 

Oh, what is geocaching? You use a GPS and some clues left by others to find a cache of stuff. Usually it's cheapie chotchkies or little toys that people leave behind, but sometimes there are some very fun things.  Aside from the GPS unit, it's as cheap as hiking and there are thousands upon thousands of caches around the world. geocaching.org will show you all about it.

 

…Sounds like fun, John.  Well, out here in the part of California where I live, we actually have 4 seasons…although today – January 7th, it was a balmy 71 degrees.  We’re still a bit soggy from the 9-1/2 inches of rain we got in 24 hours.  So the great outdoors aren’t so great right now.  But I take your point.  I’m sure Maine is a bit more like the North Pole right now…in fact, aren’t you in the arctic circle?  (JK)

 

From Frank Wit – of the Frank Wit podcast:

Thanks so much for playing my sister Jennifer's song "Delivery"... she has three kids herself and would very much appreciate your podcast... if she was computer literate, which shes not ;) I always let her know when new casts play her songs though. Thanks again! I myself have an explicit (adult only) podcast... it's so much fun isn't it. Take care!

 

…Well, explicit?  OK, yeah, he uses a fair amount of profanity…still…its entertaining.  If you like sitting around watching your friends get drunk and get silly, you’ll really like the Frank Wit podcast.  Apparently, lots of folk do like it – hey I thought it was pretty funny. He’s in the Podcast Alley top 10 right now – must be doing something right.

 

That reminds me – if you like the show – or even if you don’t like the show and are just sensitive to the power of suggestion, PLEASE vote for my show!  I know its an ego thing – so would I be doing this if I didn’t have one?  Mine hasn’t been fed in awhile – he’s very malnourished.

 

 

[Cue Wipes Use #37 Intro]


 

Baby Wipes Use: Central Processor Processor

 

You have no doubt heard my trusty laptop in the background during my daddycasts.  You can hear the whine of its turbo-jet cooling system, screaming in the night as I talk into this way-to-sensitive microphone that picks up a housefly farting in the kitchen trashcan.

 

Well, I for one got sick of it.  And in a weak delusional moment, thinking of myself as handy around the house, I decided to quietize my noisy friend here and find out what was causing the noise that has begun plaguing my audio perfection.

 

Laptop repair is much too much like watch repair.  And I loathe watch repair.  Too many watches have died at my hands because I don’t have the eyesight, the patience or the tools for the job.  But COMPUTER REPAIR is something I know a bit about.  So I set out to work, as usual, without a manual, attempting to dissect my silicon podcast partner to find the source of the screaming.  And the vision thing is still an issue.

 

Got the panel off where the fans are, and found, to my amazement, a wad of fuzz stuck inside this fan-air-guide-thingy that was rubbing on the inside of the cooling duct and making that horrendous noise I had grown so sick of hearing.  Now the quiz: How do I get this apart to get the fuzz out?  Oh, look, the screws are numbered…1…2…3…4…5…6.  OK, I get that.  I undid all 6 screws and lifted the fans off the bottom of the laptop.  But the CPU chip was stuck to the fans!  It pulled right out of its socket, bending pins along the way.  But hey – I got that fuzzball out!

 

Now I was close to panic.  This was one expensive piece of silicon here.  It was loose, so I pulled it off the fans, and it was covered in grey heatsink compound – consistency of real sticky peanut butter – and I was getting it everywhere.  The chip was now stuck to my finger!  This stuff was like glue – smelled like housefly farts – and I was now so freaked out that I was concerned that I would break the CPU chip and there’d be no show!  Oh the horror!

 

Baby Wipes to the rescue!  They managed to un-stick the crud from me, the fans, they even did a nice job cleaning the dust off the bottom of my laptop.  I had to go to the computer store and pay $13 for a tiny syringe of ‘silver-7’ – the stuff that bonds the processor chip to the fans – and now my baby runs so nice and quiet.  Hah – baby – I called the laptop baby – baby wipes – baby – get it…

 

[Cue Drop_1]

We all make these about this time of year.  I resolve not to fix my laptop myself anymore!

[Cue Song #2 Chris Ayer – “New Years Resolution”]

 

Ready for the ToonTest?

[Cue ToonTest 27+28]

Answers: #3 – Hercules, #2 – Legend of Tarzan, #1 – Teacher’s Pet.

 

[Cue Alan Jay - Time]

That’s it…we’re all wiped out.  Thanks everybody for listening and subscribing and participating in the discussion. 

 

PLEASE send your comments, suggestions, topics you’d like discussed on the program.  The cool thing about podcasts is it IS a two-way street.  Yeah its my show, and Evan’s show, but its your show too.  Don’t be shy – e-mail me.  I won’t bite. 

 

I’d like to thank my hero, Jonathon Coulton, Chris Ayer, and Beatrice Ericcson,  This is hers, its called ‘Reach Out’.  Podsafe – on the podsafe music network.  Until the next daddycast…See YA!

 

[Cue Song #3 Beatrice Ericcson – Reach Out]

[Cue Alan Jay – Groovy Baby]